© Receptional Ltd, 1999-2010. Upper Floors, 7 Station Square, Flitwick, Bedfordshire, UK. MK45 1DP. Telephone: 01525 715520. Registered in England No: 3863417
Google's newly launched personalised search has attracted little fanfare outside the SEO community, however it has the potential to be significant to every internet user: The way we use search, the way we use the internet in general, and it could even have a significant impact on the fortunes of many businesses and organisations. This update is arguably the most significant to Google's search for several years, and will likely have many more repercussions than are immediately obvious. Personally, I also think there is a somewhat sinister side to the change.
In terms of improving user experience, personalised search could be a good move, if it does indeed improve the quality of results returned. But what about people who are bad at searching? Yes, for those of us that know how to come up with sensible queries that will find us the results that we are looking for, and can spot a spam result without clicking on it, we may see sites that are useful to us appear more often in search results. But what about the average, or less than average searcher? I'm sure most of us have one somewhere in our family: They surf the web through a letterbox made by a 400px high stack of toolbars and manage to repeatedly infect themselves with spyware. Potentially, they could end up with result pages full of garbage. If they are in the habit of only clicking on the first couple of returned results for queries the problem could be compounded.
We may even see malware being created which exists purely to search Google and visit links in the results, to boost the ranking of certain sites for certain queries on the host PC.
Another issue I can see is times when surfers do not want to see results they have already looked at - they want to see fresh or different things they haven't seen before, for example someone scouring message boards to try and find a solution for a technical issue. Adding an option to disable adjustment to rankings would help this.
But what really worries me is that it's hard to imagine this change not having the effect of slowing the rate of change of search results - new sites and brands might find it more difficult to rise to the top, even if they offer a superior service/product: Big names and top results could become entrenched at the top of SERPs. I bet there will be a lot of large organisations and multinationals breathing a sigh of relief with this news - as it will likely lower their chances somewhat of being felled from the top of the rankings, now or in the future.
Finally, I think Google are really onto a winner with personalised search - cookies have rarely if ever been all that valuable in the past, but imagine the situation in a couple of years where someone without a Google Account who has been building up search history buys a new computer. Suddenly their search results are completely different. What lesson they might learn, if they are not happy about the change? Get a Google account.
Comments
Interesting Article
Great Article Miles,
How will the SEO industry be effected by this? Do you foresee the entire marketplace being changed with this new search methodology? Will all of our work go to waste?
SEO and PWS
Thanks Andy, I appreciate your comment!
That's a good question, and my answer to it would be 'no'. I think the marketplace will change - but then search marketing changes rapidly anyway. In my mind the types of search most likely to be effected by personalised search will be generic or brand related.
It is possible that traditional SEO, in the very limited sense of achieving ranking for a particular keyword or keyphrase, may become less worthwhile, if it is very generic (like "holidays" or "mobile phone"). Though many would already consider such an approach a little short-sighted, with much commercial value found in "long tail" searches.
At the moment and for the foreseeable future, there will always be a sizeable proportion of users starting from a 'fresh slate', for whatever reason, whether it's because they have bought a new PC/phone, they are at an internet cafe, or have simply cleared their cookies or changed to a new browser. It's worth remembering too that people search for a huge variety of keyphrases, a large proportion of which will be new for them and not effected by PWS.
SEO will continue to be important, both in the traditional sense, and increasingly so with new site development and more specialised roles.
There will still be sites with unspiderable URL schemes, sites suffering from duplicated content issues and a myriad of other problems. This 'problem-fixing' side of SEO will certainly not go away, and my thoughts are that the importance of this side of SEO will become more widely known and appreciated over the next couple of years
The strategic side of things - doing keyphrase research, setting out site categorisation/hierarchy and deciding how to market for search will also remain just as important.
I think overall, the largest noticable effect of PWS to SEO/online marketing will be in increasing the value of established domains in certain sectors - a startup company may not look to find a unique brand name, register a new domain and develop a site on it anymore, but to buy an established domain that already gets the sort of organic traffic they are targetting and repurpose it. This won't change the importance of SEO in that site's development though.
narrowing view
Personalization certainly narrows the view of the internet through the search engines. True, all cookies are prone to be deleted (or not synchronized to new machines). However the news exclusion does work not this way only.
For search engine builders it can be important source of information about what the news really is, hence, your personal news coming as a response to your queries maybe even more relevant than w/o personalization.
No one knows what is really behind the curtain.
Post new comment