Did you know that Twitter search uses both your domain name and your page name as factors in part of its search algorithm, even when you go through some URL shorteners? But it depends WHICH URL shorteners.
I started this test by accident. As you do. I regularly check on whether anyone has said anything about various clients. I used twitter search on this occassion to search for "majesticseo" and found a result in Greek!:
You'll notice that the word I searched for was not in the post by xNikos and if you are even more inquisitive, you'd also notoce that the search word was not even on the visible text on the landing page (except as an image). No - Twitter decided to parse the bit.ly URL and analyze the URL of the end domain. Then it used the domain name as part of its search algorithm.
Twitter also parses page names and part URLS
Spotting xniko had deep lilnked, I then looked to see if Twitter would return the same tweet when I searched for the filename only... "comparedomainhistory.php" and then the filename without the extension "caomparedomainhistory". Yep in both cases:

and

So THANKS nNikos, for starting me on a Twitter search analysis. You are wasting my Sunday night - but thanks!
Testing hyphens vs underscores
I found that Twitter is treating hypens as spaces, but underscores it treats as characters. I tested this on the URL: http://www.ferry-to-france.co.uk/dover_calais.html and found that when I shortened this in bit.ly, whilst Twittercould easily find it with a search for "ferry france" (without the "to" incidentally):

The same search engine failed when searching for just "calais", even though it coped with a search for "dover_calais":

Not all URL shortners are parsed properly by Twitter.
Unfortunately, for me at least, this counts as a black mark against using your own URL shortener - something I have always been keen on. We have our own URL shortner - r3.ms - so we don't lose control of our URLs for as long as we can. But doing the same test using this URL shortener fails. I set up :

The above search was MEANT to pick up http://www.ferry-to-france.co.uk/corsica.html which I tweeted via http://r3.ms/2t, but no joy.
So what did I learn?
- Using Bit.ly has benefits on Twitter Search in the algo. I haven't tested others.
- Twitter searches words in domains (treating hypens as spaces)
- Twitter search for words in filenames with or without extensions
- Twitter does NOT treat an underscore as a space, but rather as a character.
Enjoy and please let me know if you publish more data abourt other URL shorteners or if you can take my fuindings further.
Dixon.
(If you would like some internet marketing consultancy, give us a shout)











Comments
Bit.ly vs other shorteners
>>I guess we need to find out what's special about bit.ly compared to r3.ms<<
I am wondering whether to transfer our URL shortener onto biy.ly pro. That might have the same effect. That's my next test :)
Very interesting!
Great post Dixon, really interesting reading! Not a wasted Sunday evening at all!
Hope that you manage to progress this further to find out more or others take on your research to try out other ones (that gives me an idea... :)
Wow, great research. It's
Wow, great research. It's amazing that they're pulling out and analysing the final domains for URL shorteners. Indicative of a possible development in real time searhc?
Interesting research! I guess
Interesting research! I guess we need to find out what's special about bit.ly compared to r3.ms
Personally I have been a big
Personally I have been a big fan of bit.ly - the opportunity for members to see the number of clicks from their posts versus the number of clicks from all bit.ly posts for that URL is great.
I've also used it to gauge internal responses to recommendations such as:
1. instructions for branches to follow local search recommendations (Google Business Directories etc.)
2. recommendations for cross team projects - good to see how many relevant managers actually click on the link in the relevant email
Great read
Great read DJ, this is really worth looking into
Post new comment